<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day Three: Women Who Don’t Kick Butt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinahunter.ca/2009/day-three-women-who-dont-kick-butt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinahunter.ca/2009/day-three-women-who-dont-kick-butt/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.tinahunter.ca/2009/day-three-women-who-dont-kick-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinahunter.ca/?p=548#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Wow. This post on Lynda&#039;s blog has gotten some really great responses. I&#039;ve copied them below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Epheme said... Confused. Time for a &#039;little&#039; women fiction? Trivializing women? Are you ignoring icons like Ursula K. LeGuin, Octavia E. Butler, Margaret Atwood to name a few??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lynda said...  I think I&#039;m looking for something in the genre. Something that upholds those timeless values but is, indeed, a bit fantastic. You&#039;ve got me thinking about what it is, exactly. But I believe it is both why I read and why I write - and also why I get depressed about the constriction of the market these days to ten-second sudden-death moments in commercial arenas. To me it is about something too fundamentally important - in an ill defined way - to reduce to commerce. Something I believe in. And need. The courage to face tragedy and emerge stronger? Maybe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tina Hunter said...  Epheme - I would never trivialize women. I truly meant that perhaps it&#039;s time that we (authors of Science Fiction and Fantasy) took a look at the values and female characters portrayed in &quot;Women&#039;s Fiction&quot; (the genre) and apply them to Science Fiction and Fantasy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are many female authors of the Sci-Fi and Fantasy genres who have already done this (to varying degrees) and their characters are the ones we are talking about... Women characters who are strong without needing a sword or alien kung fu to &quot;kick butt&quot;. I hope that clarified my point for you. Let me know if not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob Budde said...  I think &quot;Women&#039;s Science Fiction&quot; is here but just coming into its own. It usually takes a critical response (reviews, essays, etc) to articulate a movement and I think that is coming. It would be interesting to ask Lisa Dickson and Stan Beeler if they teach a separate unit on women&#039;s science fiction in their classes . . .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lynda said...  Interesting idea Rob. And thanks for dropping in! &quot;Women&#039;s Science Fiction&quot; would be almost antithetical to the classic era where women almost never read the genre and problems were solved by &quot;out teching&quot; the other guy. There WERE values. But they were taken for granted. We&#039;re the good guys, so the only challenge here is figuring out how to defeat the bad guys with a better ray gun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tina Hunter said... Women&#039;s Science Fiction.  I love it.  I&#039;m using that coin of phrase (with your permission Rob) on my blog.  Thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This post on Lynda&#39;s blog has gotten some really great responses. I&#39;ve copied them below.</p>
<p>Epheme said&#8230; Confused. Time for a &#39;little&#39; women fiction? Trivializing women? Are you ignoring icons like Ursula K. LeGuin, Octavia E. Butler, Margaret Atwood to name a few??</p>
<p>Lynda said&#8230;  I think I&#39;m looking for something in the genre. Something that upholds those timeless values but is, indeed, a bit fantastic. You&#39;ve got me thinking about what it is, exactly. But I believe it is both why I read and why I write &#8211; and also why I get depressed about the constriction of the market these days to ten-second sudden-death moments in commercial arenas. To me it is about something too fundamentally important &#8211; in an ill defined way &#8211; to reduce to commerce. Something I believe in. And need. The courage to face tragedy and emerge stronger? Maybe.</p>
<p>Tina Hunter said&#8230;  Epheme &#8211; I would never trivialize women. I truly meant that perhaps it&#39;s time that we (authors of Science Fiction and Fantasy) took a look at the values and female characters portrayed in &#8220;Women&#39;s Fiction&#8221; (the genre) and apply them to Science Fiction and Fantasy.</p>
<p>There are many female authors of the Sci-Fi and Fantasy genres who have already done this (to varying degrees) and their characters are the ones we are talking about&#8230; Women characters who are strong without needing a sword or alien kung fu to &#8220;kick butt&#8221;. I hope that clarified my point for you. Let me know if not.</p>
<p>Rob Budde said&#8230;  I think &#8220;Women&#39;s Science Fiction&#8221; is here but just coming into its own. It usually takes a critical response (reviews, essays, etc) to articulate a movement and I think that is coming. It would be interesting to ask Lisa Dickson and Stan Beeler if they teach a separate unit on women&#39;s science fiction in their classes . . .</p>
<p>Lynda said&#8230;  Interesting idea Rob. And thanks for dropping in! &#8220;Women&#39;s Science Fiction&#8221; would be almost antithetical to the classic era where women almost never read the genre and problems were solved by &#8220;out teching&#8221; the other guy. There WERE values. But they were taken for granted. We&#39;re the good guys, so the only challenge here is figuring out how to defeat the bad guys with a better ray gun.</p>
<p>Tina Hunter said&#8230; Women&#39;s Science Fiction.  I love it.  I&#39;m using that coin of phrase (with your permission Rob) on my blog.  Thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.tinahunter.ca/2009/day-three-women-who-dont-kick-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinahunter.ca/?p=548#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Wow. This post on Lynda&#039;s blog has gotten some really great responses. I&#039;ve copied them below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Epheme said... Confused. Time for a &#039;little&#039; women fiction? Trivializing women? Are you ignoring icons like Ursula K. LeGuin, Octavia E. Butler, Margaret Atwood to name a few??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lynda said...  I think I&#039;m looking for something in the genre. Something that upholds those timeless values but is, indeed, a bit fantastic. You&#039;ve got me thinking about what it is, exactly. But I believe it is both why I read and why I write - and also why I get depressed about the constriction of the market these days to ten-second sudden-death moments in commercial arenas. To me it is about something too fundamentally important - in an ill defined way - to reduce to commerce. Something I believe in. And need. The courage to face tragedy and emerge stronger? Maybe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tina Hunter said...  Epheme - I would never trivialize women. I truly meant that perhaps it&#039;s time that we (authors of Science Fiction and Fantasy) took a look at the values and female characters portrayed in &quot;Women&#039;s Fiction&quot; (the genre) and apply them to Science Fiction and Fantasy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are many female authors of the Sci-Fi and Fantasy genres who have already done this (to varying degrees) and their characters are the ones we are talking about... Women characters who are strong without needing a sword or alien kung fu to &quot;kick butt&quot;. I hope that clarified my point for you. Let me know if not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rob Budde said...  I think &quot;Women&#039;s Science Fiction&quot; is here but just coming into its own. It usually takes a critical response (reviews, essays, etc) to articulate a movement and I think that is coming. It would be interesting to ask Lisa Dickson and Stan Beeler if they teach a separate unit on women&#039;s science fiction in their classes . . .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lynda said...  Interesting idea Rob. And thanks for dropping in! &quot;Women&#039;s Science Fiction&quot; would be almost antithetical to the classic era where women almost never read the genre and problems were solved by &quot;out teching&quot; the other guy. There WERE values. But they were taken for granted. We&#039;re the good guys, so the only challenge here is figuring out how to defeat the bad guys with a better ray gun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tina Hunter said... Women&#039;s Science Fiction.  I love it.  I&#039;m using that coin of phrase (with your permission Rob) on my blog.  Thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This post on Lynda&#39;s blog has gotten some really great responses. I&#39;ve copied them below.</p>
<p>Epheme said&#8230; Confused. Time for a &#39;little&#39; women fiction? Trivializing women? Are you ignoring icons like Ursula K. LeGuin, Octavia E. Butler, Margaret Atwood to name a few??</p>
<p>Lynda said&#8230;  I think I&#39;m looking for something in the genre. Something that upholds those timeless values but is, indeed, a bit fantastic. You&#39;ve got me thinking about what it is, exactly. But I believe it is both why I read and why I write &#8211; and also why I get depressed about the constriction of the market these days to ten-second sudden-death moments in commercial arenas. To me it is about something too fundamentally important &#8211; in an ill defined way &#8211; to reduce to commerce. Something I believe in. And need. The courage to face tragedy and emerge stronger? Maybe.</p>
<p>Tina Hunter said&#8230;  Epheme &#8211; I would never trivialize women. I truly meant that perhaps it&#39;s time that we (authors of Science Fiction and Fantasy) took a look at the values and female characters portrayed in &#8220;Women&#39;s Fiction&#8221; (the genre) and apply them to Science Fiction and Fantasy.</p>
<p>There are many female authors of the Sci-Fi and Fantasy genres who have already done this (to varying degrees) and their characters are the ones we are talking about&#8230; Women characters who are strong without needing a sword or alien kung fu to &#8220;kick butt&#8221;. I hope that clarified my point for you. Let me know if not.</p>
<p>Rob Budde said&#8230;  I think &#8220;Women&#39;s Science Fiction&#8221; is here but just coming into its own. It usually takes a critical response (reviews, essays, etc) to articulate a movement and I think that is coming. It would be interesting to ask Lisa Dickson and Stan Beeler if they teach a separate unit on women&#39;s science fiction in their classes . . .</p>
<p>Lynda said&#8230;  Interesting idea Rob. And thanks for dropping in! &#8220;Women&#39;s Science Fiction&#8221; would be almost antithetical to the classic era where women almost never read the genre and problems were solved by &#8220;out teching&#8221; the other guy. There WERE values. But they were taken for granted. We&#39;re the good guys, so the only challenge here is figuring out how to defeat the bad guys with a better ray gun.</p>
<p>Tina Hunter said&#8230; Women&#39;s Science Fiction.  I love it.  I&#39;m using that coin of phrase (with your permission Rob) on my blog.  Thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- www.000webhost.com Analytics Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php"></script>
<noscript><a href="http://www.hosting24.com/"><img src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php" alt="web hosting" /></a></noscript>
<!-- End Of Analytics Code -->

